Questions? 800.667.7745; Voice Mail: 925-391-0363
Email: info@mentalhealthce.com
Add To Cart

Section 1
An Attorney's Perspective: Preparing the Expert to Testify

Question 1 | Test | Table of Contents

California Courts 

If you wish to increase the text size of this publication, maximize your window.
Click outside the box below, press Ctrl “+” several times, then scroll.
Questions? Email: info@mentalhealthce.com

-Kuchler, Deborah D. An In-Depth Look at Direct Examination of Expert Witnesses. California Courts, 2010 p 5-7.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
Gardner, B. O., Titcomb, C., Cramer, R. J., Stroud, C. H., & Bate, B. P. (2013). Perceived personality similarity and perceptions of expert testimony. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(4), 185–192.

Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence? Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 638–649.

Maeder, E. M., & Pica, E. (2014). Secondary confessions: The influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors’ perceptions of informant testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 38(6), 560–568.

QUESTION 1
How to ensure favorable expert testimony? To select and enter your answer go to Test
.


Test
Section 2
Table of Contents
Top