Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979
CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
Indications for Couple Therapy in BPD
For BPD patients, couple therapy may offer unique advantages over individual psychotherapy. Most of the therapeutic efforts have been focused on individual psychotherapy, and their response to therapy has been complicated by a number of factors. First, patients with these disorders tend to not engage in therapy. Patients with BPD frequently drop out of therapy within the early months of treatment ( 13, 14). A prospective study of sixty young-adult borderline inpatients referred for psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy indicated that 43% of patients failed to complete six months of treatment ( 13) and similar high dropout rates occurred in pharmacological studies ( 15). In a study of successful individual psychotherapy, Waldinger and Gunderson ( 16) found that only 10% or fewer patients with severe personality disturbance were considered to have successfully completed therapy. Second, psychotherapy research suggests that individuals with personality disorders require increased length of treatment in comparison to other disorders to demonstrate change. The relationship between length of psychotherapy treatment and symptom-pattern improvement has been most effectively shown by Kopta and colleagues ( 17). Their work indicated that individuals with personality disorders required the greatest number of sessions versus other disorders in order for 50% of patients to show recovery. This 50% recovery rate for personality disorders occurred at an average of fifty-two sessions.
Our experience suggests that not enough attention has been given to marital-therapy interventions with patients with BPD. Couple therapy, similar to group therapy, can dilute the intensity of the transference relationship that is rapidly formed in therapy with BPD patients ( 18). The negative transferential aspects are typically projected onto the spouse while the therapist receives the positive projected aspects of the transferential relationship. As long as the therapist can avoid reacting based on these projections, the engagement in therapy can be enhanced.
Interventions may stabilize a crisis that has been activated for the individual with BPD involved in a martial relationship. Couples with a partner suffering from BPD often demonstrate a repetitive cycle of going from crisis to a sense of security and comfort, to a new crisis. Attachment mechanisms best explain how the couple fluctuates between crises, even leading to suicidality for some, to feeling secure and comfortable in the relationship. According to attachment theory ( 19), the accessibility and responsiveness of our primary attachment figure, such as a marital partner, provides us with a sense of personal security. A stable intimate relationship satisfies our primary need for trust, safety, and dependency on another person. Distress in a couple occurs when the basic attachment needs for security, protection, and closeness are not met. A real or perceived threat of attachment disruption can lead to anxiety and distress and even suicidal behavior ( 20).
However, the crisis will quickly dissolve when the attachment relationship is reestablished and there will be a return to previous levels of stability. Even in disturbed couples, therapy can stabilize an attachment crisis and lead to dramatic improvement over short periods of time. Longer-term therapy, however, can lead to a working through of the attachment difficulties and some modification of the interactional styles. The longer contract can be useful to create more long-lasting changes. To summarize, using couple therapy may potentiate therapeutic engagement and response in individuals with BPD.
The selection of patients for couple therapy requires a careful individual assessment of both spouses and a characterization of their psychological health and personality pathology. The selection of candidates for any psychotherapy requires the presence of certain talents, honesty, perseverance, and a desire to change ( 21). Paris ( 8) suggested that the patient's work history is the best predictor of treatability with psychotherapy for personality-disordered patients.
When completing the individual assessment of the patient with borderline psychopathology, it is important to take a careful treatment history. The nature of previous treatments should be reviewed as well as patients' response to these treatments. If patients have a history of repeated negative experiences to therapy and they report having felt victimized by the experience, this would be an important feature to document. Patients who act out against the therapy boundaries may be at risk of having a very negative reaction to therapy. Frances and colleagues ( 22) used these two historical features as indications for deciding that the patient should be offered no therapy as the best option regarding care.
To decide whether couple therapy is appropriate for a borderline patient, we developed a hierarchy based on the individual's "core problems" ( 23). Hurt et al. ( 23) recommended that effective treatment planning begin with a characterization of the patient's core areas of difficulty. Based on cluster analyses of BPD criteria, Hurt et al. ( 23) described three clusters of criteria that could be used to define different groups of patients who would need different treatment strategies and would form different therapeutic or healing relationships. The three clusters proposed by Hurt et al. ( 23) provided our framework for deciding on the appropriateness of couple therapy and the approach to utilize. The rest of the paper will be devoted to describing the three-level hierarchy and to using a case to illustrate the type of patient that falls within each level.
Impulsive borderline patients will give a history of numerous therapy contacts that were terminated before completion, and therefore, they present a challenge to any therapist. These patients may be difficult to engage, and engaging them will be a central part of therapy. However, if they do not characterize the previous therapy experiences as very negative, these patients may be accessible for further work. Often the borderline patient goes through a series of brief therapies; however, the cumulative impact of the therapies may lead to important changes. Gunderson ( 2) observed this phenomenon and likened it to a "bucket brigade" in that each bucket of water in succession, that is each brief therapy, was a factor in decreasing the raging or impulsive fires within the borderline individual.
Individual or group therapy, utilizing cognitive behavioral approaches, should be the first line of treatment to decrease the impulsivity and develop alternate coping strategies. In the case example, we illustrate that such a couple should be referred for individual help. However, part of the intervention can be directed at developing a safety plan for each of the spouses while individual therapy works on dampening the level of impulsivity.
Case 3: Borderline Couple with a Healthy Caretaker Spouse
Over this ten-year period, his emotional state and behavior had been stabilized and he had become the owner and director of an art gallery. He had hired Patty as his executive assistant and they had married eighteen months later. Patty and John were referred to us for couple therapy by John's individual therapist. Patty felt that she was burning out as the caregiver in the relationship. She was exhausted from absorbing John's constant anguish and expression of suicidal wishes. They needed our help in creating some changes or the marriage would be in jeopardy. John felt that he had had enough therapy, but was eager for some peace in the relationship as well and was willing to participate to save the marriage.
Assessment and Therapy
Our focus was to talk frankly with them about the borderline diagnosis and the importance of the changes needed in the relationship to stabilize the crises. Patty needed John to back off when he was dysphoric and find more methods for self-soothing. He needed to respect her limits on how long they discussed a topic that was contentious. We taught them the time-out strategy. John also agreed to sit down rather than pace the room during discussions. They both learned to identify and distinguish their own emotions more clearly. John showed his dysphoric moods when he was anxious or distressed or feeling insecure. Individual cognitive-behavioral strategies to challenge his inner dialogue or voice with a more soothing and appropriate script seemed to help him. Party's reaffirmation that she was committed to the marriage also reassured John and helped him be more responsible for his own behavior. Patty in turn realized that her leaving the room or the house to end the discussions relieved her distress but frightened and disturbed John about the security of the marriage. She would learn to stay and ask for a reasonable time-out to collect her thoughts and cool down the discussion.
Patty learned how to recognize when John was in high gear and to develop strategies to diffuse or to help him gain control of his emotions. Her stability and commitment meant that the therapy sessions became working sessions for the couple. Patty developed better coping strategies and felt more comfortable setting limits on John's angry behavior. She felt that she should come every so often after the contract for our support, either by herself or with John. She also set the limits and expectations that John must continue on his antidepressant medication and see his individual therapist regularly. She created more safety and balance for herself by taking some of the art history courses that they had discussed, seeing friends, and spending some relaxed holiday time with John. The couple did well in terms of developing new coping strategies, and increasing the safety, security, and commitment in the marriage. They felt much more stable and able to work out emotional issues than they had before counseling. We saw them once at six-month follow-up and periodically for the next two years. They continued to do well.
Reflection Exercise #7